$QUBT. Revisited: The Read Has Changed
A crowded short against a stock that refuses to fall is a position with a deadline. My read on how it ends.

Listen: hear this article read aloud (about 2 min).
Quantum Computing Inc. Common keeps going up and the short keeps pressing. One of those has to give.
$QUBT sits at $6.63, $0.37 below its 20-day high of $7.00 and $1.24 above its 20-day low of $5.39.
My read: lean bullish. Buyers are close enough to force the issue, but I want volume before I call it a breakout.
Pressing into strength
Against its own 60-session range, $QUBT is 32.1% below the high of $9.76 (Sep 23) and 22.9% above the low of $5.39 (Nov 5). $QUBT closed higher in 4 of its last 9 sessions. Volume over the last five sessions averaged 1.5x the twenty sessions before them.
The largest one-day move in the past twenty sessions was -12.4% on Nov 5.
68% of QUBT's off-exchange volume printed as short sales (FINRA daily short volume), against a normal 56%. Days to cover: 9.5. Every short in the name needs 9.5 full days of normal volume to get out.
What I make of it: a crowded short matters only if the stock stops falling, and then covering becomes buying. Whether that starts here is the whole question.
What the market looks to be pricing in
Off-exchange trading: QUIET: no block prints, 43% off-exchange. No block-size prints (10,000+ shares or $1M+) in this window. Off-exchange volume is spread across small prints, which is what internalized retail flow looks like.
In options, dealers short gamma, call wall $8.00, put wall $6.00, gamma flip near $4.50, hedge pressure 0% of an average day's volume. Days to cover 9.5, 70.0M shares short, short interest +4.0% since the last report.
Squeeze risk 15 of 100; shorts pressing 64 of 100. Across the broader market, the read is Neutral (bias -15).
Sentiment readings show bullish (58 of 100).
What I make of it: the data agrees with itself more than it argues, and that counts for something. It still falls short of proof.
The bull case
- Short squeeze setup with a measured path to $9.04
The bear case
- Backdrop: Neutral (bias -15)
- High short volume is routine in liquid names
The part nobody is talking about
What I think traders are overlooking is how close the call wall sits to my target. The strike where the calls are stacked can pull price toward it or pin it there, and that makes it a level to watch, not a prediction.
The price alone doesn't show it.
If I'm right, and what proves me wrong
If $QUBT posts a close above $6.94 and volume expands, I think $9.04 becomes the next serious test. Under $5.96, I'm wrong.
The honest objection is that short volume is not a short position. A high ratio is routine in liquid names, and sometimes the shorts are simply right.
That's the whole trade: a level to clear, a line that proves me wrong, and not much in between.
Kill switch
Any one of these and the thesis is over, no averaging down, no renaming it.
- A close through $5.96.
- Selling absorbs the buying at a key level and price loses it on volume.
- Order flow reverses: the sweeps and blocks turn to the other side.
- A scheduled event changes the picture before the trigger is reached.
What I'm watching
I lean higher, not loudly. The setup earns the lean and not the conviction, and it gets the conviction only when volume shows up.
Desk record. 32 of 189 scenario targets traded before their invalidation (17%), 105 stopped out, 52 ran out of time, average outcome -0.11% per piece. Past pieces say nothing about this one.
The desk's scenario leans bullish. Bull or bear, the kill switch above is what keeps either view honest.
Sources and further reading: SEC EDGAR filings for QUBT · FINRA daily short sale volume files · Nasdaq short interest: QUBT · Cboe options quotes: QUBT · Quantum Computing Inc. Common investor site · QUBT quote, chart and data on StockMarketLoop.
Data as of Nov 10, 7:11 AM ET: options positioning, FINRA short volume, the off-exchange trade record, the structure map, SEC filings and the ticker's headlines. Vaughn McNair (Grandmaster-Obi) and Making Easy Money may hold or trade positions in the names discussed. This is speculation and education, not financial advice.

Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only issues.
Free. Confirm by email. One click to leave.
Discussion (0)